Agentic AI IDE from Cognition (formerly Codeium)

Moonshift vs. Windsurf

Windsurf is an agentic IDE where Cascade edits files inside your editor. Moonshift turns one prompt into a deployed Next.js app, repo, database, and launch kit. Different jobs.

Feature-by-feature

What you actually get from each

Each row names a real thing operators ask about. No category-coded badges, no `we win everything` rows. If Windsurf is better at something we say so.

Capability
Windsurf
Moonshift
Generates full app from one prompt
If you want a product not files on disk, this matters.
Cascade can scaffold
Deploys the app
Code without a live URL is not a launched product.
Your Vercel
Pushes to your GitHub
Long-term home should be your account.
git push manual
Provisions database
Real apps persist data; setup is annoying.
Turso
Auth scaffold wired in
Sign in, sessions, password reset are table stakes.
Better Auth
Launch kit drafted
Posts, images, hero copy take longer than the build.
Proprietary fast model
Latency on per-keystroke completions matters in an editor.
SWE-1.5
Pipeline-tuned routing
Predictable monthly cost
Quota systems still penalise iterative work.
Pro $20 quota; Max $200
Per-run moon cap
Multi-file refactor on existing repo
Mature codebases need 12 files changed at once safely.
Cascade strong
Iterate flow
Side-by-side

Where the two diverge

01

Editor agent vs deployed product

Windsurf is an editor with Cascade as the agent layer. You open a project, Cascade reads context, you accept or reject diffs. Moonshift is a pipeline of 14 specialised agents that runs server-side, then hands you a deployed app and a launch kit. Windsurf stops at the edit; Moonshift stops at the launched URL.

Moonshift: Moonshift ships further from prompt to live URL
02

SWE-1.5 and the latency story

Cognition shipped SWE-1.5 as a proprietary fast model after acquiring Windsurf in December 2025; published benchmarks cite roughly 13x lower latency vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 on common edit tasks. For an editor that streams completions on every keystroke this matters a lot. Moonshift runs longer phases (planner, frontend, validator, marketer) where each phase is tens of seconds, so SWE-1.5-style latency wins do not change the user-perceived flow.

Windsurf: SWE-1.5 is a real edge inside an editor
03

Pricing in practice

Windsurf moved from credits to quotas in March 2026. Pro went from $15 to $20 in April 2026, Teams from $30 to $40 per seat, and a Max tier landed at $200 per month for power users. Heavy operators report landing at $100 to $200 per developer per month once you account for Max. Moonshift bills per run with a hard per-run moon ceiling enforced between phases; the cap is what you pay.

Moonshift: Per-run cap is more predictable than quota tiers
04

Launch kit vs raw code

After Windsurf finishes editing, you still write the X thread, draft the LinkedIn post, render the hero image, push to GitHub, configure Vercel, point a domain, and provision a database. Moonshift's marketer agent writes a 5-tweet X thread and a long-form LinkedIn post in your voice during the build. The image-gen agent renders three card sizes. The publisher agent stages everything behind a HITL approval gate so nothing posts without your sign-off.

Moonshift: Launch kit is a build artifact, not a TODO list
05

Cognition's two-product play

Cognition now owns both Windsurf (editor IDE) and Devin (autonomous SWE agent). The roadmap signal is that Cascade gets more orchestration over time and Devin gets tighter IDE integration. That converges Windsurf toward a hybrid editor + asynchronous agent. Moonshift is a separate category: zero-to-deployed product. The two are compatible, not substitutes.

Tie: Different categories; both worth running
What lands in your hands

After the build finishes

Windsurf output
  • Diff-approved multi-file edits in your local repo
  • Cascade agent runs across the open project
  • Terminal access for shell + git commands
  • Optional cloud agent (Cognition heritage from Devin)
Moonshift output
  • Deployed app on your Vercel account at your domain
  • GitHub repo pushed to your account, not ours
  • Turso database with schema, seeded, migrated
  • Auth, sessions, password reset wired in
  • Landing page copy and hero image, on-brand
  • X thread (5 tweets) and LinkedIn post drafted
  • Three image prompts rendered for social cards
Pricing, honestly

What you pay, and what it actually gets you

Public pricing as of 2026-05. Updated when either side changes.

Windsurf pricing
Free$0

Basic quota; access to standard models; community support.

Pro$20

Increased quota; SWE-1.5 + frontier models (Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5, Gemini 3.1 Pro); unlimited Tab + Command. Was $15 before April 2026.

Pro Ultimate$60

Higher quota; more concurrent agent runs; legacy tier still listed in some places.

Teams$40/seat

Centralised billing; team admin; raised from $30 in April 2026.

Max$200

Top public tier; large quota uplift; targeted at heavy daily agent users.

Moonshift pricing
Welcome trial$0

5,000 welcome moons on sign-up (~7 full launches). No card. One-time grant.

Hobby$19

5,000 moons/month (~7 launches). Every launch feature unlocked. Custom domains. Your Vercel + GitHub + Turso.

Starter$49

15,000 moons/month (~21 launches). Adds iterate-tab (chat-turn editing) + run scrub & replay.

Pro$99

35,000 moons/month (~50 launches). Adds full-mode (deeper reasoning) + cinematic landing agent included. Priority support.

Frequently asked

Windsurf vs Moonshift, common questions

Is Windsurf still Codeium?
Codeium rebranded as Windsurf, then was acquired by Cognition in December 2025 for around $250M. The product is the same Windsurf editor; Cognition added the SWE-1.5 fast model and tightened integration with Devin-style asynchronous agents.
Should I cancel Windsurf if I use Moonshift?
Not necessarily. Moonshift is best for going from a prompt to a deployed product. Windsurf is best for in-editor multi-file edits with Cascade. Most Moonshift users open the generated repo in Windsurf the same day for downstream polish.
Why is Windsurf's quota system a problem?
Quotas reset on a schedule and the unit is opaque (different prompts cost different amounts). For iterative work where you re-prompt the same file ten times, the bill grows in ways that are hard to predict before the period closes.
Does Moonshift have anything like Cascade?
Not in the same form. Moonshift has an iterate flow that runs through the agent pipeline for whole-route changes. For surgical in-editor edits across 14 files, Cascade is the right tool.
How fast is SWE-1.5 really?
Cognition reports roughly 13x lower latency than Claude Sonnet 4.5 on common edit tasks. In an editor that streams completions on every keystroke this is a meaningful UX win. In a Moonshift-style pipeline where each agent phase runs for tens of seconds, the perceived gain would be smaller.
The verdict
Pick Moonshift when

Pick Moonshift when you are starting from zero and want a deployed Next.js app on your Vercel, a real GitHub repo, a Turso database, and a drafted X thread + LinkedIn post in roughly six minutes. The pipeline assumes you want a launched product, not an empty editor.

Pick Windsurf when

Pick Windsurf when you already have a codebase open in an editor and want Cascade running multi-file edits with its proprietary SWE-1.5 model (reported 13x faster than Claude Sonnet 4.5). The Cognition acquisition in December 2025 brought tighter Devin-style orchestration and a steady cadence of IDE-grade features.

Bottom line

Windsurf owns 1 to n inside an editor; Moonshift owns 0 to 1 from a prompt to a launched product. Many builders run a Moonshift build, then open the generated repo in Windsurf for downstream edits.

Stop at the deploy, or keep going until launch.

Moonshift builds the app and drafts the launch in one run. You approve. The first user sees a post you would actually publish.

We do not pretend to win every comparison. Cursor is better for IDE work, v0 for components, Base44 for Play Store. Moonshift is the only one that ships your launch posts with the build.